The iPhone Air is not promoting effectively to date

In a means, the iPhone Air is probably the most radical departure for Apple since 2017’s iPhone X. Not a lot as a result of it has a singular kind issue; relatively, it is as a result of it is the primary time for the reason that X that Apple has bought a non-budget iPhone that is not only a minor variation of one other one. The iPhone XR I owned was a scaled-back model of the iPhone XS — likewise, the iPhone 13 might have shipped in Mini, Professional, and Professional Max variations, however the principle issues separating them have been cameras, efficiency, display screen measurement, and refresh charges. On the surface, you most likely would not have the ability to inform the distinction between a 13 and 13 Professional besides for his or her lenses.

The phrase from Morgan Stanley analyst Erik Woodring (by way of MacRumors), although, is that the Air gambit will not be paying off. Whereas demand for the iPhone 17 lineup is reportedly sturdy, and will even see a manufacturing improve, the Air has to date confronted “relative weak point,” as Woodring places it. That is a imprecise declare, and gross sales might all the time flip round — however anyway you slice it, it is most likely not what Apple needed to listen to, not when it spent a lot of its September 9 occasion singing the Air’s praises.

Frankly, I hope Air gross sales proceed on a downward trajectory. You’ll be able to most likely guess the the explanation why, nevertheless it’s value elaborating on them, and whether or not we’ll see a follow-up Air in 2026.

The iPhone Air is a foul deal

Sending a message to Apple

Just lately, I bought into hassle in a web-based feedback part by claiming that folks “ought to” purchase the iPhone 17 as a substitute of an Air, as a result of the Air is an inherently worse product. As anticipated, some individuals rushed to the Air’s protection, arguing that thinness and lightness could be value as a lot as any function. From there, issues shortly took a flip. Just a few individuals insisted that I had no proper to say what different individuals ought to worth; one individual even argued I used to be “dictating” what individuals can buy, as if I have been placing a gun to somebody’s head on the Apple Retailer.

To make my place clearer, I’ll say upfront that I am impressed by the Air as a chunk of engineering. Regardless of it being so skinny, it is remarkably robust, to the purpose that testers have wanted industrial gear to get it to bend or break. And as Apple was desperate to level out throughout its announcement, many of the “guts” of the telephone — corresponding to its processor and storage — are all stuffed into the digicam bump (AKA plateau). A lot of the body is devoted to its lithium-ion battery, and that is no imply feat.

Let’s get this straight although: excessive thinness and lightness will not be that significant in 2025. Whereas the Air is perhaps nice to carry, I am unable to bear in mind the final time I heard anybody, wherever critically complain in regards to the measurement or weight of a smartphone that wasn’t deliberately outsized, just like the iPhone 17 Professional Max or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Extremely. That is as a result of smartphones have been each skinny and light-weight for a really very long time. Even the heaviest iPhones ever, the 13 Professional Max and 14 Professional Max, weighed simply 8.47 ounces (240 grams) every. The Air could also be noticeably lighter at 5.82 ounces (165 grams), however nobody is struggling to carry up a Professional Max except they have larger issues at work.

Larger fashions could also be more durable to stuff right into a pocket, however that is owing to display screen measurement greater than thickness — which the Air would not remedy. The product has a 6.5-inch show, larger than the 6.3-inch one on the iPhone 17. Apple would not even rely the Air’s digicam bump when it measures thickness, both. At that a part of the gadget, it is about 11.32mm — slightly below the 11.4mm of the iPhone 17’s bump. If you cannot get a 17 in your pocket, likelihood is the Air can be simply as dangerous, if not worse.

All this is able to be irrelevant if it weren’t for the Air’s digicam tech, battery life, and pricing. Not like the 17, there is no secondary ultra-wide digicam. You’ll be able to’t shoot macro images, not to mention tight group portraits or large vistas. Battery life, in the meantime, is sufficient, however nonetheless decrease than that of each different iPhone within the fall 2025 catalog. So actually, you are paying $200 greater than a 17 for one thing that can be more durable to reside with. You do get a sooner A19 Professional processor, however even that has one much less GPU core than the identical chip within the iPhone 17 Professional.

Sure, then, the iPhone Air is a foul deal. And if it someway proves in style in the long term, it is going to ship the mistaken message to Apple — which you could cost individuals extra for much less and get away with it.

Is there a future for the iPhone Air?

Reply hazy, attempt once more

Except the present mannequin is a catastrophic failure, I believe it is protected to anticipate an iPhone Air 2 in 2026. Apple has clearly invested loads of money and time into the underlying expertise, and it is uncommon for the corporate to place that form of effort right into a one-off product. Bear in mind, we bought two generations of iPhone mini regardless of weak gross sales.

The true query mark is 2027. If the Air 1 continues to get a lukewarm response, and/or the Air 2 would not blow anybody out of the water, I might simply see Apple pulling the plug on an Air 3. Certainly, that may not be within the playing cards anyway — it is apparent that Apple’s final aim is laying the groundwork not only for a foldable iPhone, however for thinner kind elements typically as soon as fewer compromises are vital. I am betting that the iPhone 19 (or no matter it is known as) will look just like the Air, however embody triple cameras, contemplating that Apple’s rivals are already making telephotos commonplace on their base {hardware}.

For the Air 2 to be successful, Apple has two choices, as I see it. The primary is to offer it modest upgrades over the Air 1, however dramatically decrease the value, making it not less than $100 cheaper than the iPhone 18. The opposite is to carry onto the present price ticket, however deliver digicam and battery specs as much as snuff. Actually, if Apple have been to change to silicon-carbon (Si-C) battery tech, the Air 2’s runtime might doubtlessly crush that of the 18 with none improve in thickness. In fact, the 18 would nonetheless reign supreme if it switched to Si-C as effectively. I am preserving my ear to the bottom for rumors on this one.